In addition to my personal reflections on DebCamp/DebConf17, here is a brief summary of the activities that I had a hand in co-ordinating.

I won’t discuss here many other small items of work and valuable conversations that I had during the two weeks; hopefully the fruits of these will show themselves in my uploads to the archive over the next year.

Debian Policy sprint & BoF

  • released version 4.0.1.0 of the Policy Manual

  • figured out documenting reproducibility in policy. Formulating the wording turned out to be easier than I had expected

  • approx. ten years after they were first published, incorporated marga’s maintscript flowcharts into policy proper

  • converted policy from docbook to rST built with the Sphinx toolchain. Many, many thanks to Hideki Yamane and David Bremner for helping Russ and I get this merged to our master branch

  • triage of every single bug against policy, and mass closure of inactive bugs, bringing the total down from more than 200 to around 125

  • conversations with Technical Committee members about how the two teams can help each other’s work (mainly us helping them to help us!)

  • conversations about how we handle disagreement and plans to streamline our overly complex BTS usertags (watch this space)

  • very useful input from policy consumers about how the upgrading checklist is formatted, and how we can recruit more people to get patches written

Debian Emacs Team meeting/sprint

  • plans to finally drop our emacsXY binary packages, and just have a single version of Emacs in the archive, so that we no longer have to deal with bugs due to someone still having emacs21 installed (David’s idea; Rob’s implementation; Sean’s mostly-helpful comments)

  • other plans to simplify and otherwise improve the Debian Emacsen policy

  • finally finished off the work needed to RM emacs24—nine months later—including a lot of NMUs

  • mentoring a junior team member

Unfortunately we didn’t make any significant progress towards converting all addons to use dh_elpa, as the work is not that much fun. Might be worth a more focused sprint next year.

Report on team website

Git for Debian packaging BoF & follow-up conversations

The BoF was far more about dgit than I had wanted; however, I think that this was mostly because people had questions about dgit, rather than any unintended lecturing by me.

I believe that several people came away from DebConf thinking that starting to use dgit would improve Debian for themselves and for users of their packages.

Web submission of comments is currently disabled.

If you have feedback please mail it to <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> and let me know if I may post your words publically.